atomic99 wrote:
What if the process was quick and painless? You would probably only get half the complaints of the 250+ I read on their Facebook page (yes, I sat there and read them all). Those complaining about the process, got a beef. But the truth of the matter is you got more people than tickets so many of those folks are going to be pissed off anyways.
I spent 3 hours trying to get a ticket. It was NOT fun.
Did the job get done? Sure. As long as you only consider the end goal and not the inconvenience to ~100,000 people, sure it was all peachy keen.
And if you were not sitting there for 3 hrs hitting "screen refresh" while the TicketLeap site failed to perform, I can see how you can have a really philosophical opinion about it.
My point is that there ARE ticket sellers who have demonstrated competence in selling mass quantities of tickets. Con KNEW they would have massive demand after the past 2 failures and STILL chose to go with a vendor that had zero demonstrated ability to perform under the conditions they knew would happen.
So, Con made a choice that inconvenienced a VAST number of people, cost tens of thousands of wasted hours for loyal fans. THAT, in my opinion, cannot be considered a triumph, whether the tickets ended up selling or not.
It was an EPIC FAIL in them giving a s**t about their fans and respecting their time, if nothing else.